Downtown Friday night

Date night. Here’s what we did. Tucson Firefighters’ chili cook-off at Presidio Park in front of City Hall. A carnival atmosphere where you buy tickets to go around and get tiny cups of the hot stuff. None of it was very good and there were too many people, mostly young folks drinking beer. Another Tucson eating event to cross off my list.

There are more weekend festivals here than anywhere; great weather is a contributing factor. We’ve got Tucson Meet Yourself with ethnic entertainment and food — Dan calls it “Tucson Eat Yourself.” Culinary, blues and folk festival are all coming up.

Certainly my favorite is the Tucson Book Festival, which will take place on the University of Arizona campus March 12-13. More than 80,000 people attended in March, with the book fest only its second year.

Festivals, shmestivals. You can look those up on any Tucson website. Tonight we walked up and down Congress Street. I wanted to see all the buildings destined for hippening up. And we peeked into the new Downtown Kitchen + Cocktails, which looked very much like SoHo in New York City, doors open to the street.

We shared a beer at the Shanty, an old 4th Avenue bar that Dan says looks exactly the same as the last time he went there in 1988. I’ve heard that it’s the place to talk politics with the regulars sitting at the bars. Crossed it off my list.

Not much of a night out. Now I’m tired after a full day’s work, riding my bike both ways, a total of around 10 miles.

We saw new faces tonight, regular people trying to have fun at the end of the week. Nothing newsworthy, but somehow after all the drama of the past few days, refreshing.

Good night.

Posted in Bopping Around Tucson | Tagged | Leave a comment

Nemesis

I’m trying to avoid talking about the election, fully intending to discuss “Nemesis,” Philip Roth’s latest book. I loved it, but it does have political connotations.

Guess everything does. Rachel Maddow just reported that Sarah Palin is running for prez in 2012. Surprise, surprise.

Fortunately, we got rid of “I am not a witch” Christine O’Donnell, the pseudo t-brain candidate for Joe Biden’s former senate seat in Delaware. I recently read a comparison that cracked me up: The t-partiers make George Bush look like Bertrand Russell. The nightmare of Sarah Palin as president is even more incongruous.

Let’s look at the irrational promise spouted by many Republican representatives and senators-elect. Kentucky’s Rand Paul insists that the new guys will focus on bringing down the deficit, yet they want to continue Bush’s tax breaks for the wealthy, which will definitely not reduce the deficit.

There’s sure to be a kerfuffle (my word of the week), you think?

Worse than the arguing and nastiness spewed in the current political climate is the inordinate amount of fear that’s become part of the American psyche.

Even children’s picture books, often elegant displays of beauty that enhance imagination, are being touted to promote hatred.  Take “The Liberal Claus: Socialism on a Sleigh,” aimed to denigrate President Obama. Yeah, this is what children need during the holiday season.

Roth’s “Nemesis,” which takes place during the polio epidemic of 1944, tells the story of 23-year-old playground director Bucky Cantor, a real mensch. By playing summertime baseball he hopes to get the neighborhood boys through a scary time without catching the deadly disease.

Bucky is committed to goodness, to his girlfriend Marcia, and to making a contribution to Weequahic, his New Jersey community. But he has no control over the terror of polio.

Contemplating our horrible election night, I thought of Bucky’s plight. Was he doing right encouraging boys to continue playing baseball? Who knew if they were contracting polio from each other? Might it be better to quarantine themselves at home all summer?

I reread a passage from “Nemesis,” when Marcia’s father, kindly Dr. Steinberg, advises his future son-in-law: “This is America. The less fear the better. Fear unmans us. Fear degrades us. Fostering less fear — that’s your job and mine.”

Posted in politics | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

A few random election eve thoughts

Think hard. In Tucson, vote for all Democrats whose last names start with  G.

On tonight’s program, Keith Olberman aired a clip of Wacky Queen Sarah talking with a moderator on Fox News (I can’t bear to call their TV stand-ins reporters). “I’ll debate them if they man up,” Sarah said, as the woman practically doubled over and snickered. Nevada Senate candidate urged Sen. Harry Reid to “man up” at their recent debate.

What’s that about? If it’s supposed to be some allusion to a distorted feminism, I don’t like it. Does it mean to agree with these two warped women about what the important issues are? Or to just humiliate them for fun, part of the new mean girl strategy?

It took the state of Alabama until 2000 to finally erase their anti-miscegenation law. How long will it take the majority of Americans to realize that it’s not fair for the most downtrodden in our society to have unequal access to health care?

In France, there were mass protests when President Sarkozy moved to raise the legal retirement age from 60 to 62. We don’t want to be socialists like those Frenchies, many Americans say. What’s wrong with not slaving away till you drop dead? Tell me, please.

How about a federal program to promote creative consultants? I figure that the feds should subsidize people over 55 who have provocative or useful ideas, including artists, authors, engineers, plumbers or scientists. I have to admit, I don’t see this happening.

I commend the guy who snatched a Koran from someone who intended to burn it, and won one of Jon Stewart’s medals at Saturday’s Rally to Restore Sanity. Reminds me of the only time we saw someone stealing at Oz Books; a woman took a children’s bible and hid it under her jacket, fleeing down Main Street in Southwest Harbor. An Ozette went after her, but she denied that she was a crook. Where have we heard that one before? Now we have “I am not a witch” Christine O’Donnell. Will be glad when she’s gone.

Good luck to our beleaguered  country tomorrow. Dan is downloading the Rally to Restore Sanity. We’re ready for a few laughs.

Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear

I felt better after watching the rally in D.C. with a few hundred other sane folks at Hotel Congress this morning. I missed the first hour because it took some finagling to attach my Goddard sign, with a “Turn Off Fox News” bumper sticker affixed to it, to my bike.

But my people were there, wearing “Yes We Can” Obama t-shirts and the like, standing in front of a giant flat-screen TV on the Hotel Congress patio.

In their inherent silliness, Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, who hosted the “evil” part of the show, argued about the size of the crowd — was it 10 million or 6 billion? Apparently, the U.S. National Park Service estimated the crowd at 200,000.

At least six friends from Tucson attended the Rally to Restore Sanity in D.C. No doubt I would have gone if I still lived in Maine. I didn’t see anyone I knew, but through one of those odd coincidences, someone behind me received an e-mail from an acquaintance at the Washington Mall.

On our collective TV Colbert reported that the New York Times, CBS and NPR all denied coverage to the event, although I checked online at home and the NYT lead story and slide show were about the rally. I’m flummoxed (but if you’ve been reading my blog you know that’s one of my favorite words).

Comedy Central and C-span broadcast the entire three-hour show commercial free. Full disclosure: Hershey (Yay chocolate!), VW and LG were the three sponsors.

The rally itself was therapeutic. I feel much calmer knowing that I’m not alone in my political lunacy rants, feeling more secure that humor can help us all.

The “conflictinators” [good one, Jon!] on cable TV didn’t cause our problems, said Stewart, but they sure as hell make solving them so much harder.

Taking the media to task, Stewart showed clips from the right and left that obfuscate the issues, with both engaging in name calling and fear mongering. Geez, I’ve done it myself.

What I saw on the clips was mostly new to me: stories from Cable TV about the horror of flip-flops, flying ants or some such craziness, and other fearful admonitions. I was reminded of “1984.”

“If we amplify everything we hear nothing” was one of Stewart’s best serious lines.

The inability to distinguish all Muslims from terrorists helps maintain a constant fearful state, another way to divide us. Who likes Muslims and who hates them? Not so simple.

I loved Stewart’s analogy comparing Americans to cars trying to get through a tunnel. We don’t ram into other cars for displaying an Obama or NRA bumper sticker. Occasionally there’s a jerk who tries to wreak havoc, but nobody likes him.

“The truth is we work together every damn day to get things done,” said Stewart. “The only place we don’t is here [in Washington] or on cable TV.”

He continued, referring to the darkness or problems that are always part of life; “and sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel isn’t the promised land. Sometimes it’s just New Jersey.” The crowd roared.

Steward admitted that he wasn’t sure why he proposed the rally. “Sanity will always be and has always been in the eye of the beholder,” he said. “But your presence here today has restored mine.”

Right on, Jon.

Posted in politics | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Pedal as fast as you can

Luckily, Dan and I are both word people. It’s as big a deal as having similar political beliefs. We make metaphorical jokes, enjoy silly puns and make up new words daily. It’s like breathing.

I’m so obsessive about correct word use that I call out people who use “importantly” instead of important. Not that big a crime, right?

Dan has become a recumbent bicycle aficionado — online he reads about bent bikes (as they’re called) for hours, watches people ride with cool musical accompaniment, cycles with various groups every weekend and has even driven back and forth to Fresno, California, in two days to purchase his dream bike. But that’s beside the point.

Dan told me last night that cyclists consistently write “peddling” when they mean pedaling. We were both, well, not exactly horrified, but I think a little dismayed. Are we just from another generation when people could spell? Or cared more about language?

Is there such a thing as word DNA? Not sure where I got mine  — maybe from old-fashioned teachers who taught spelling — but my kids are both exquisite writers who honor the perfect word. Brook and Ethan had a great-grandfather who wrote a history of Russia, a grandmother and grandfather who wrote textbooks, nutrition and chemistry, respectively.

Dan’s grandfather was a war correspondent and later sports editor for the Cleveland Plain Dealer, and his mom was supreme copy editor at the Arizona Daily Star for 30 years.

Now both in their 80s, Dan’s folks decipher crossword puzzles together for fun. And Dan’s son, Connor, has fallen in love with linguistics in college.

We care about words. Ethan’s favorite word as a little boy was dusk. I’ve always loved the word flummoxed. Brook, her boyfriend, Gianmarco, Ethan and I made a campfire on a Mount Desert Island beach last month after her birthday dinner.

What did we do that night, under the full moon starting her 34th year? Played Scrabble on an iPad until 2 a.m.

We’re word people. Dan and I have both repeated phrases over the years that make us smile, guffaw and bond us to our families.

May we peddle words as long as we both shall live.

Posted in Journalism/Writing | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Happy hour musings

Every six weeks or so Penny, Julie and I pick a new place to experience happiness together. We drink wine and try yummy new appetizers. Last night it was 47 Scott with its tasty pork fritters, deep-fried pickles, and most impressive thinly sliced apples arranged in a fan as a garnish to baked brie. We want to try Janos’ new Downtown Kitchen + Cocktails but we’ll wait till it calms down a bit after last week’s opening.

We talk about everything in our short two hour visit: the color orange and the nature of horizontal stripes; what it means to be Jewish, if not religious are we genetic, historical or cultural Jews; fear of death and the possibility of past lives (two say yes, one says no); our teeth and gums; Social Security (two care, one doesn’t yet); a little bit of politics, but uh, we’re there to be happy; Odyssey Storytelling, the Burrito Files and new projects; what to do about burgeoning stomachs, and is it worth it to enjoy food and not worry so much about the fantasy of becoming svelte; refinancing my house in Maine and paying off credit card debt — the thrill of it; my upcoming Arizona Jewish Post story on mental illness in the Oct. 29 issue… I’m sure there was more but that’s all I can remember this morning.

In a way, some research says it doesn’t matter what we talk about but explains why sisterly chats make people happier. I used to wish my brother and I would talk more about personal stuff instead of movies, politics and sometimes the Boston Celtics. But I’ve realized that it’s the connection that matters (my brother has a rather odd view that it’s ok if we don’t see each other often, because “I know what you look like”).

But you know what, it’s really nice to hear his voice.

Posted in Food/happy hours | Tagged , , | 7 Comments

Addendum to “Journalism” post

I referred to the famous line from “Network” in my Oct. 17 “Journalism” post. Apparently, Carl Paladino, or Crazy Carl, the nutty N.Y. Republican nominee for governor, has co-opted “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore!”

In my earlier post I was thinking of poor Howard Beale, the news anchor in “Network” who finally goes beserk. Beale was co-opted by right-wing corporate interests: Think Rupert Murdoch and the like.

In the early ’70s, I was outraged by an ad that appeared in Boston MBTA stations: “Get a peace of the action” with a guy holding his hand up in a peace sign. The ad was for a car dealership. Guess the joke was on us peaceniks.

That inane language weirdness reminds me of the current political climate, with tea party loonies yelling about the need for a Republican populist takeover, while the rich get richer. Tea party candidates benefit from undisclosed campaign contributions — thanks to the right-leaning activist U.S. Supreme Court.

After all these years being a political junkie, teaching about politics  and trying to be a menschette (the feminine of a good person), I still don’t get how so many Americans carry on about socialism/communism/liberalism and whatever tag line the wealthy choose to finish off the middle class. Yeah, don’t fund education or health care; that’ll put us in our place.

Instead, supposedly sane Americans are being co-opted to care more whether the separation of church and state is Constitutional (duh?), if gays can marry, or women can control their own bodies — while tea partiers profess to want government out of our lives???? Pleeeeeeeaze.

I still like Barack. He doesn’t have the stomach for all this crap. I’m an optimist too, and had hoped his eloquence and intellect would change the political climate.  Didn’t Wild Bill leave us with a budget surplus and The Dumb Decider leave us in humongous debt? Cmon’ people!

This election is a sham if candidates win who don’t have sufficient education or real-world experience, who collect stimulus funds while railing against it.

No doubt that my media brothers and sisters are spinning tea party wins, contributing to fear and loathing on the progressive side.

Enough ranting. I’m going for a hike.

It ain’t over till the fat lady sings…it ain’t over till the fat lady sings.

Posted in politics | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

“Life” by Keith Richards

The Rolling Stones have been with me for a long time. For most of my life I regretted — along with not getting a PhD. —  the void, never having seen the legendary rock band live.

Then I turned 60. My brother, Joel, who lives in Boston, purchased tickets for us, along with my nieces and Amy and Alison, to eliminate a regret. Can’t beat that. (Now I don’t care about getting a doctorate either).

When I read the piece about Keith Richards’ new autobiography in today’s New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/24/arts/music/24richards.html?pagewanted=2&ref=homepage&src=me), I thought “good for him.” In fact, I was charmed.

Keith Richards telling it like it is/was, melodic guitar genius, former heroin addict, tree climber at an advanced age, and I’m not sure I want to know what else. But the music, ah, the music.

I always preferred the bad boys of rock ‘n’ roll to the shiny haired Beatles. Where did that come from? So when a stage started edging out down the center of the giant Fleet Center, and women my age started throwing their panties, bras, probably their phone numbers, at the bad boys’ feet, I just smiled. Looked at my 30-something nieces, we were all giggling, my brother clearly enjoying the nostalgic rush.

“I know it’s only rock ‘n’ roll but I like it. I like it. Like it. Aw, I like it…” Thanks, man.

Posted in It's only rock 'n' roll | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

“Freakonomics”

Read the book by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner. The movie, “Freakonomics,” which I saw on Sunday at Tucson’s cool Loft Cinema, helped me understand all the freakiness better, even if its lengthy examination of corruption and Sumo wrestling was too overwrought for me. Almost put me to sleep.

My favorite part was their clever explanation of the significant reduction of crime during the ’90s. There were the usual suspects, more police on the streets, less crack, and such.  But what accounted for a 50 percent reduction in crime was the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. That’s right.

Here’s how it plays: When women were able to abort unwanted fetuses in the ’70s, it greatly reduced the number of unhappy young adults and unhappy not-so-good mothers in the 1990s, and voila — less crime. How elegant.

And best of all, the discovery proves that you never know why things happen the way they do. How lucky these guys were to have big-kid work, pursuing questions that intrigue them, then enlightening the rest of us, proving that it’s always good to use your imagination.

Posted in Bopping Around Tucson | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Another pseudo political debate

Phew, I’m sure glad that I didn’t stroll over to the University of Arizona student union last night to watch the Congressional “debate” with Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), Jesse Kelly, her loudmouth challenger and Steve the libertarian, who had no idea what to say half the time.

Gabby looks great with her new hip haircut. She pushed the fact that she’s the “only military wife in Congress!” That was a surprise, that she would push that fact. But she’s got to, considering the lunatic fringe loudmouth voters. She’s worked hard. Not that she’s always reflected my views but for the most part I trust her intentions.

Kelly had the most quotable line of the evening, I’ll give that to him: “I’m for a 10 percent flat tax. If it’s good enough for Jesus it’s good enough for me.” Huh?

Does anybody remember when Ronald Reagan suggested that pollution was the fault of trees? I didn’t get that either, but how could Kelly even imply that a religious policy of 2,000 years ago has any credence in today’s world? Yeah, and Benjamin Franklin didn’t have an iPad either. Does Kelly care what makes sense?

Course not, it’s the tagline: I’m a Christian, I’m a Christian, that’s all you need to know about me. Ha ha ha ha ha, she’s not.

I’m glad I didn’t attend the debate because it was mostly about which candidate’s supporters hollered the loudest, which makes me wonder, does politics bring out childishness? I want my guy to win, no matter what, uh, cause he’s my guy. It’s like a game of dodge ball. I was always picked last for team sports so I didn’t care about my team. If I was going to win at anything I had to do it myself.

Some people are team players, but when they’re left alone they can’t keep their mouths shut. Delaware Republican U.S. Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell must think she’s smart, or she’s too stupid to realize how little she knows. In her debate last night she asked if  separation of church and state was part of the Constitution. http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/19/odonnell-questions-church-state-separation/

We’re in big trouble.

Posted in politics | Tagged , , | 1 Comment